Hotel Fazenda Santa Tereza
About this property
Popular facilities
See all facilitiesGood to know
- Check-in
- From 14:00
- Check-out
- Until 12:00
- Parking
- Free
- Pets
- Not allowed
- Languages
- German, English, Portuguese
Guest reviews
Recent reviews shared by hotel guests
Alyssa B.
I’m glad I saw Randy’s comment before booking, and I want to respond to Dr. Munn since Randy didn’t. A public discussion seems fair when it helps people decide where to spend their money and whether their visit supports or harms the environment they hope to experience respectfully. Dr. Munn, I respect your ecology background and your stated commitment to protecting habitats, but I’m not persuaded by your defense of feeding wildlife. Regularly putting food out so tourists can see animals more reliably, especially predators like ocelots, is generally considered poor wildlife management. The concern isn’t how brief each feeding is. Repeated food linked to people can change animals’ movements, hunting, and wariness, even when the incentive is small. I don’t think bird feeders, farming, or providing water are good comparisons. Intentionally baiting a wild carnivore for predictable encounters with paying guests is a different practice, and calling it “harmless fun” dismisses the ethical and ecological questions. Tourism may help protect places like the Pantanal, but that doesn’t make every way of attracting visitors acceptable. Conservation shouldn’t depend on practices that could alter wildlife behavior, especially when established guidelines warn against feeding for that reason. I’m also troubled by the confident claim that there is “no negative impact” without independent evidence, monitoring, or reference to recognized conservation standards. With your academic background, I’d expect a more evidence-based response to a well-known concern in wildlife ethics. Your website’s promise that guests will “see what they came so far to see, or your money back” points, to me, toward certainty and spectacle over authenticity. Wild animals aren’t attractions that should be produced on demand. The uncertainty of seeing wildlife is part of what makes the Pantanal meaningful, and removing it risks making a wild experience feel like a managed display. I’m not comfortable supporting tourism that deliberately feeds wild animals to make sightings easier. Wildlife tourism should keep interference minimal and let animals remain fully wild. I hope you’ll reconsider the practice and move toward ecotourism that truly supports the environment and teaches visitors.

Caleb F.
This lodge makes money by feeding wild animals, including monkeys, foxes, and, worst of all, ocelots. I find that completely unethical. Anyone who cares about wildlife conservation should avoid staying here.
Marina C.
The setting and location were lovely. We also enjoyed watching capybaras roam freely, and there’s great birdwatching.
Liam P.
The jabiru nest was certainly lovely, and we had a pretty good view of an ocelot on the night we stayed. Still, the seating and payment arrangements left a sour note. Theatre seats are numbered, and guests who pay more get better ones. With several tour or expedition groups, you don’t know how your seat compares until you arrive. We were moved to the second row, where visibility is worse. Since everyone already pays a pretty penny to be here, I think a lottery would be fairer. If that kind of arrangement might dishearten you, be prepared for it. Bring BRL cash. We were charged 5% extra for card and 10% for USD cash, which seemed strange for an American outfitter. We hadn’t been told despite asking about payment methods. Replies to questions can also be slow or absent, so ask well in advance and be ready to follow up. As for the ocelot, they say the viewing runs from 4-7pm, but the staff only take everyone to the trail at 4.50pm and have them leave at 6pm. That means about 45 minutes to watch. We were lucky to see it, but food is put directly on a tree log, which seems to be why sightings are so likely. It made me wonder about the ethics of an activity supported by tourist dollars. There wasn’t much explanation or signage about the ocelot, either. The website doesn’t say what they feed it or explain why giving it chicken daily for an hour supposedly doesn’t harm wildlife. If it doesn’t affect the ecosystem, why don’t all lodges do this? We later saw another wild ocelot on a night safari at a different lodge. It looked significantly less chubby than this one, which left me wondering. The setup itself is nice. I just don’t know how I feel about the ethics.
Ravi N.
Really good, right in the middle of Pantanol. The food was excellent, and the rooms were cozy and very hygienic. Warm service and toilets too. The price was extremely competitive. Totally loved it.
Amenities
Everything available at this property
General Services
7 available- Air conditioning
- Room service
- Diet menu (on request)
- Airport transportation
- Transfer services
- Hiking
- Fishing
Internet
1 available- Free Wi Fi
Parking
1 available- Free parking
Meals
1 available- Bar
Pool and beach
2 available- Swimming pool
- Outdoor pool
Pets
1 available- Pets Not Allowed
Languages
3 available- German
- English
- Portuguese
What's nearby
Explore attractions, restaurants and transport around the hotel
40.1 km
Attractions
2- Rio Bento Gomes40.1 km
- Portal Transpantaneira44.9 km

Stay rules
Important conditions for your stay